- From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:57:47 -0800
- To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Cc: "Misha Wolf" <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-international@w3.org>, <ietf-languages@iana.org>
> From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com] > "Native" may be too strong, especially in languages of wider communication > that cross country boundaries. Swahili is probably a case of this: > six out of seven speakers are non-native, and it is heavily used in > several countries. Fair enough, though coming up with a truly accurate definition that deals with all sociolinguistic possibilities would be rather difficult. Even allowing for L2 speakers it's not obvious how to express the right idea. "FSI level 5 competency" comes to mind, but wouldn't mean much to a lot of people. Peter Constable
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:58:04 UTC