- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:18:46 +0900
- To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-international@w3.org
At 15:24 05/01/19, Martin Duerst wrote: >At 21:32 05/01/18, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote: >>real world usage of RSS shows that even properties designed to have a >plain-literal value are often used containing encoded XHTML. The widely >used RSS mod:content [1] mandates the encoding of XHTML in a plain literal > >I originally thought about using this module. But now I see that they >indeed have used escaping. This is just simply not the way combination >of namespaces is supposed to work in XML. And to me personally, I'm >sad to say, but it simply looks disgusting. I'm glad to know that at least >one feed format, namely Atom, at least allows inline content without >escaping. I'm glad to report that I just found the 'payload' module in RSS 1.1 (http://inamidst.com/rss1.1/payload) that uses XML Literals rather than encoding. Great! Regards, Martin. >>1. http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 07:18:55 UTC