- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:34:55 +0900
- To: "Krall, Gary" <gkrall@verisign.com>, "'Chris Lilley'" <chris@w3.org>, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org
At 03:45 05/01/08, Krall, Gary wrote: > >Chris: > >Just for clarification does your answer imply that an RSS reader would need >to support IDNA to make this work? If it does resolve IRIs, which I guess most RSS readers do, then yes. Otherwise no. RDF as such does not require resolution, and therefore does not require IDNA support. IDNA support is available in libraries (e.g. libidn or idnkit) that can easily be integrated into other software (but are a bit bulky because of the tables needed). Regards, Martin. >Thanks, > >Gary. > >-----Original Message----- >From: www-international-request@w3.org >[mailto:www-international-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Chris Lilley >Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:36 AM >To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer >Cc: www-international@w3.org >Subject: Re: IRI and IDN in RDF > > > >On Friday, January 7, 2005, 7:23:22 PM, Reto wrote: > > >RBG> Hello > >RBG> I'm wondering how URLs based on IDN should be represented in RDF/XML: >RBG> - no particular encoding (= default of xml document) >RBG> - %... encoding >RBG> - punycode > >Since it is XML, the IRI can be expressed in regular characters (the >encoding of the document) and conversion to punycode, hex escaping etc >can be left to the URI resolver. > > >-- > Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org > Chair, W3C SVG Working Group > Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2005 14:27:06 UTC