- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:19:17 -0500
- To: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
- Cc: IETF Languages <ietf-languages@iana.org>, WWW International <www-international@w3.org>
Peter Constable scripsit:
> No. I was simply suggesting what I think makes best sense for tagging
> content in Standard Arabic, which is to tag it the way it has been
> getting tagged for the past decade: "ar".
Agreed. However, ar is also usable, on 639-3-draft principles, for the
Arabic colloquials, as I said.
--
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan
Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration
is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was
under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than
two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today.
--Specht v. Netscape
Received on Monday, 27 December 2004 23:19:58 UTC