- From: Tex Texin <tex@xencraft.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 03:47:11 -0800
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, WWW International <www-international@w3.org>, IETF Languages <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Ivan Herman wrote: > I think Chinese is unique. The difference in the simplified and traditional is essential > and created a 'cut' in chinese writing which is much more important than for any other > scripts (afaik). I don't see why it would be more essential to Chinese than an Azerbaijani wanting to distinguish arabic vs cyrillic vs latin... In some ways it could be argued to be less essential, since between Simplified and Traditional, some of the characters are the same, or similar...
Received on Monday, 27 December 2004 11:47:19 UTC