Jungshik Shin scripsit: > Absolutely. The multi-level representability of Korean script > demonstrates its 'advanced' status as a script (invented only 5.5 > centuries ago, it must have been able to build upon more than 2,000 > year's history of writing system), but at the same time, has been a > continuous source of "trouble" because it's hard to agree on which level > to use. OT question: is Korean script to some degree the product of stimulus diffusion from Indic script of any sort? By "stimulus diffusion" I mean the reinvention of a cultural concept (in this case, alphabetic writing) as a result of hearing that some other culture has the concept, but without any details. -- John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." --Hal AbelsonReceived on Sunday, 7 December 2003 20:22:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:40:48 UTC