- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 05:20:44 +0200
- To: billings@global360.com
- Cc: www-international@w3.org
* Steve Billings wrote: >RFC 2184 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2184.html) seems to say it can't be >done: > > Current [RFC 2045] grammar restricts parameter values (and hence > Content-Disposition filenames) to US-ASCII. We recognize the great > desirability of allowing arbitrary character sets in filenames, but > it is beyond the scope of this document to define the necessary > mechanisms. We expect that the basic [RFC 1521] `value' > specification will someday be amended to allow use of non-US-ASCII > characters, at which time the same mechanism should be used in the > Content-Disposition filename parameter. > >Is there some form (newer than RFC 2184) that enables non-ASCII characters >in the HTTP Content-Disposition filename parameter value? There is the proposed standard track document RFC 2231 which obsoletes RFC 2184.
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2003 23:21:09 UTC