- From: by way of Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 07:43:16 +0900
- To: www-international@w3.org
Quoting Peter_Constable@sil.org: > Actually, my point was specifically that *part* of the infrastructure is > already present, at least in OpenType, but not *all*, either in OpenType > (meaning of "language" in the OT spec needs to be clarified, and > relationships between these tags and the "language" tags used for data e.g. > RFC 3066, need to be resolved)... 'Language system' (not 'language') in the OpenType specification actually means *writing* system, i.e. a particular set of orthographic/typographic conventions associated with the use of a particular script. 'Language system' is a misnomer -- an historical artifact of the incomplete understanding of the format's original designers --, and it has caused all sorts of confusion, especially among people who assume that the OT 'language system' tags must have some relationship to things like NLS tags. There is no necessary relationship and, indeed, it is possible to conceive of a user wanting to apply, for instance, the typographic conventions of German to a language other than German. I've suggested to Microsoft and Adobe that the term used in the spec should be changed, or at least annotated. John Hudson
Received on Sunday, 29 September 2002 19:04:15 UTC