- From: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:05:43 -0400
- To: Jungshik Shin <jshin@mailaps.org>
- CC: Unicoders <unicode@unicode.org>, WWW International <www-international@w3.org>
Jungshik,
I used characters that should display differently. Some punctuation and
some like (I think it is) the bone character.
However, feel free to suggest a list of characters that should be
distinctive and I'll post a page with them that we can all review
whether there are differences or not on various platforms, browsers,
etc.
I agree for many characters there should be no differences.
tex
Jungshik Shin wrote:
> Actually, you might have had hard time telling the display difference
> depending on what characters you used for your testing EVEN IF you
> configured browsers to use different (but with __very similar__ design
> principles and look/feels) Unicode-cmapped (but NON-pan-script) fonts
> for TC,SC, J and K *under MS Windows*. This difficulty demonstrates
> that CJK Unification in Unicode/10646 is not such a big problem as some
> people tried to make it.
>
> Jungshik
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com
Xen Master http://www.i18nGuy.com
XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com
Making e-Business Work Around the World
-------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 12:06:16 UTC