- From: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 14:50:23 -0400
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: www-international@w3.org
Chris Lilley wrote:
> TT> Chris Lilley wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, 9:24:37 AM, Tex wrote:
> >>
> >> TT> What is the proper way to add ruby to a 1.0 transitional doc,
> >>
> >> aha, you refer to 'transitional' vs 'strict'. Yes, transitional is
> >> being phased out. There is little presentational gloss remaining in
> >> transitional that you can't do (better) with CSS.
>
> TT> ok. Maybe I missed it, but a clear indication not to pursue the approach
> TT> would save time.
>
> Not to try to ad parts of 1.1 to 1.0 yourself? Oh, i thought you had
> already decided that.
Sorry, no. I meant to bring transitional forward to 1.1.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com
Xen Master http://www.i18nGuy.com
XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com
Making e-Business Work Around the World
-------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 14:50:31 UTC