W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Rush request for help!

From: Jungshik Shin <jshin@mailaps.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 17:24:25 -0500 (EST)
To: "Suzanne M. Topping" <stopping@bizwonk.com>
cc: "Unicode (E-mail)" <unicode@unicode.org>, "Nelocsig (E-mail)" <nelocsig@yahoogroups.com>, "I18N (E-mail)" <i18n-prog@yahoogroups.com>, "Www-International (E-mail)" <www-international@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0112211717260.3798-100000@www.ykga.org>
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Jungshik Shin wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Suzanne M. Topping wrote:
> > The two examples I dug out of various ongoing email debates etc. are

> up at (Chinese character variant dictionary compiled
> hold up. As Thomas Chan once remarked on this list, Japanese objection to
> CJK unification would have been much smaller if more canonical
> glyphs (as listed in the aforementioned variant dictionary) have been
> used in TUS 3.0 table.

  Compare the canonical glyph and variants given for U+76F4
at  with
glyphs in TUS 3.0 p. 677 and p. 886.

  Jungshik Shin
Received on Friday, 21 December 2001 17:25:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:40:46 UTC