- From: Bob Jung <bobj@netscape.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:32:04 -0700
- To: Thierry Sourbier <webmaster@i18ngurus.com>
- CC: www-international@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3B8A8414.8070003@netscape.com>
FYI, IMAP version 4rev1 specifices modified utf-7 for mail folders,
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2060.html.
5.1.3. Mailbox International Naming Convention
By convention, international mailbox names are specified using a
modified version of the UTF-7 encoding described in [UTF-7]. The
purpose of these modifications is to correct the following problems
with UTF-7:
...
Thierry Sourbier wrote:
>>>Quoting Carl Brown
>>>
>>>How long do we have to maintain 7 bit telecommunications capability?
>>>
>
>Don't ask me, I have no clue :)). All I can see is that RFC2152 is not yet
>marked obsolete therefore if I were a disciplined developper I might be
>tempted to follow it if I need to deal with SMTP :). That said I totally
>agree that old technologies should be phased out at some point. If would be
>great if we can consider that using 8 bits everywhere is safe, but who will
>give the signal?
>
>May be Khurram Ilyas could help us understand why he needs to use UTF-7? May
>be we can convince him than UTF-8 is just so much better and is now safe for
>what he wants to do :).
>
>By the way there was a 7 hours delay between the time I send my posting and
>the time it was received :(. This means that my answer was written well
>before John Cowan's one (hence me not taking into account his comments).
>
>Have all a great week end,
>
>Cheers,
>Thierry Sourbier
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------------
>www.i18ngurus.com - Open Internationalization Resources Directory
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 13:31:09 UTC