- From: Bob Jung <bobj@netscape.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:32:04 -0700
- To: Thierry Sourbier <webmaster@i18ngurus.com>
- CC: www-international@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3B8A8414.8070003@netscape.com>
FYI, IMAP version 4rev1 specifices modified utf-7 for mail folders, http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2060.html. 5.1.3. Mailbox International Naming Convention By convention, international mailbox names are specified using a modified version of the UTF-7 encoding described in [UTF-7]. The purpose of these modifications is to correct the following problems with UTF-7: ... Thierry Sourbier wrote: >>>Quoting Carl Brown >>> >>>How long do we have to maintain 7 bit telecommunications capability? >>> > >Don't ask me, I have no clue :)). All I can see is that RFC2152 is not yet >marked obsolete therefore if I were a disciplined developper I might be >tempted to follow it if I need to deal with SMTP :). That said I totally >agree that old technologies should be phased out at some point. If would be >great if we can consider that using 8 bits everywhere is safe, but who will >give the signal? > >May be Khurram Ilyas could help us understand why he needs to use UTF-7? May >be we can convince him than UTF-8 is just so much better and is now safe for >what he wants to do :). > >By the way there was a 7 hours delay between the time I send my posting and >the time it was received :(. This means that my answer was written well >before John Cowan's one (hence me not taking into account his comments). > >Have all a great week end, > >Cheers, >Thierry Sourbier >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >----------------- >www.i18ngurus.com - Open Internationalization Resources Directory > > > >
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 13:31:09 UTC