- From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 18:39:21 -0700
- To: www-international@w3.org
- Cc: fyergeau@alis.com
Hello, I am preparing a W3C publications guide, and would like to link to your response to the question below. I plan to recommend that editors of W3C specifications refer to characters by their correct Unicode names. From _The Unicode Standard, Version 3.0_ (sorry that is the latest hard copy available to me at this time), page 101: "The Unicode 1.0 character name is an informative property of the characters defined in Version 1.0 of the Unicode Standard. The names of Unicode characters were changed in the process of merging the standard with ISO/IEC 10646. The Version 1.0 character names can be obtained from the CD-ROM accompanying the standard or from the ftp site. See also Appendix D, Changes from Unicode Version 2.0. Where the Version 1.0 character name provides additional useful information, it is listed in Chapter 14, Code Charts. For example, U+00B6 PILCROW SIGN has its Version 1.0 name, PARAGRAPH SIGN, listed for clarity." To select an example with more variables from the ftp site at ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/3.1-Update/NamesList-3.1.0.txt 002E FULL STOP = PERIOD = dot, decimal point * may be rendered as a raised decimal point in old style numbers x (arabic full stop - 06D4) x (ideographic full stop - 3002) Thanks to the I18n Working Group, I learned that PERIOD is the Unicode 1.0 name, and "dot" and "decimal point" are acceptable aliases. My question is this. Is PERIOD outdated? Is it correct to refer to this character (.) as "full stop, dot, or decimal point, and NOT period"? (Or is PERIOD capitalized to show it is the best alias?) Thank you, -- Susan Lesch - mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.858.483.4819 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) - http://www.w3.org/
Received on Saturday, 25 August 2001 21:39:29 UTC