- From: Carl W. Brown <cbrown@xnetinc.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:40:10 -0700
- To: <www-international@w3.org>
Andrew, Have you read the Li18nux2000 spec? It looks like ICU will become part of the OS. If so, then it should be much easier to implement full C/C++ Unicode and locale support than starting from scratch. Carl > -----Original Message----- > From: www-international-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-international-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Andrew Cunningham > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:19 PM > To: webmaster@befrienders.org; www-international@w3.org > Subject: RE: International business communications and Unicode > > > At 03:36 PM 8/23/01 +0100, Eric Jarvis wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: www-international-request@w3.org > >[mailto:www-international-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Andrew > >Cunningham > >Sent: 23 August 2001 14:00 > >To: John Cowan > >Cc: Andrew Cunningham; Thierry Sourbier; www-international@w3.org > >Subject: Re: International business communications and Unicode > > > >> Quoting John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>: > >> > >> > > >> > <plug>Linux does quite a bit better, BTW.</plug> > >> > > >> > >> my personal hope is that linux will evolve in a way that will > >break > >> our current reliance on microosft for multilingual computing. > > > >as somebody trying to run a site in 15 languages (and growing)...it > >is my fervent hope that whatever evolves will stick to a single > >globally applied standard...I don't care who provides it...I would > >like to be able to know that a single form of character encoding > >will work for any language AND will be able to be read by all users > >with their standard set up > > > > YEP > > >it seems to be a long way off > > > > > unfortunately > > > >
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2001 19:40:11 UTC