- From: Misha Wolf <misha.wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 17:45:47 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www international <www-international@w3.org>, Unicode Discussion <unicode@unicode.org>
Larry Masinter wrote: > > Donald Page wrote: > > Rubbish, any browser which either uses the font of the terminal it is > > running under (e.g. lynx) or which the user can define which font to use > > for display is Latin-0-capable. I reckon that is pretty much every > > browser. > > Using ).16K, where the user must set the ).16 in order to understand > the message, is unreliable. > > (To properly read this message, please set your mail browser to use a ).16 > in which > ) is an alternate rendering of 'f' > . is an alternate rendering of 'o' > 1 is an alternate rendering of 'n' > 6 is an alternate rendering of 't' > K is an alternate rendering of 's'.) I l.ve it! Misha ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 1997 12:54:12 UTC