>> I think it very unlikely that plain 16-bit Unicode will be adopted by >> browsers in the next year or two. > >Why not? It is more compact for East Asia (apart from the fact that >compression can be used anyway). I might understand if you would say >that it might not be adopted by content providers. But for browsers, >supporting UCS2/UTF-16 in addition to UTF-8 is an extremely small >addition, so I don't even see why there is discussion about it. As I said, I have a server *today* that can generate UCS-2. I would like to use that in Asia if I could.Received on Wednesday, 5 February 1997 12:00:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:40:40 UTC