- From: Martin J. Duerst <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 12:18:55 +0100 (MET)
- To: "M.T. Carrasco Benitez" <carrasco@innet.lu>
- cc: www-international@www10.w3.org
On Thu, 23 Jan 1997, M.T. Carrasco Benitez wrote: > There are at least two Sync Functions: > > - Linguistic Unit Mark.- The text marked is a Linguistic Unit. The > corresponding Linguistic Units in the other linguistic versions are > translations. > > - Place Mark.- This is a place in the doc. The text to the next Place > Mark is not a Linguistic Unit. The some linguistic versions could be > incompleted. > > Perhpas both functions could be fulfill with only one type of Sync Mark. They can, and they probably should. A place is just a zero-length Linguistic Unit. The SPOT element mentionned by Bert just has the advantage of not needing an end-tag. But sync functions should anyway be done with attributes, and not with additional elements. Regards, Martin.
Received on Thursday, 23 January 1997 07:21:59 UTC