- From: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 19:28:37 +0100 (MET)
- To: jbettels@netscape.com, Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
- Cc: koen@win.tue.nl, ftang@netscape.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, Alan_Barrett/DUB/Lotus.LOTUSINT@crd.lotus.com, Ed_Batutis/CAM/Lotus@crd.lotus.com, bobj@netscape.com, mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch, www-international@www10.w3.org, i18ngroup@netscape.com
On Jan 10, 8:39am, Jurgen Bettels wrote: > I suggest having a wording saying that the wildcard in absence of > a q-value should be used with a lower priority than any explicitly > enumerated charset. Right, good. Better than the fixed value I suggested. Similar for Accept-Language and Accept, of course. So in general, * means "if you don't have what I wanted I will take whatever you have" while absence of * means "if you don't have what I wanted, send a 300 Multiple Choices response" -- Chris Lilley, W3C [ http://www.w3.org/ ] Graphics and Fonts Guy The World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/people/chris/ INRIA, Projet W3C chris@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 93 65 79 87 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 10 January 1997 13:30:14 UTC