- From: Drazen Kacar <Drazen.Kacar@public.srce.hr>
- Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 20:17:13 +0100 (MET)
- To: kweide@tezcat.com (Klaus Weide)
- Cc: rosenne@NetVision.net.il, masinter@parc.xerox.com, Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr, www-international@w3.org
Klaus Weide wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 1996, Jonathan Rosenne wrote: > > The best solution to the problem raised is via "accept-language". It can be > > reasonably assumed that if my preferred languages include French I can > > display the French characters. No, it can't. You probably don't have Latin 2 fonts installed. If I happen to visit you and you let me use your browser, I'll set accept-language to hr. But there still won't be Latin 2 fonts. I don't think it would be reasonable to expect I'll carry them in my pocket. :) > Well that is what I don't like - "it can be reasonably assumed" means > guessing is involved. Ideally Acccept-Language should express what > human language I want, no more and no less. There is no good reason > why I shouldn't be able to express "I want that text in Russian, but > have only Latin2 characters". Even more than that. I can read Cyrillic when I have to, but it's a hard going. I'm not sure I can read handwriting at all. But, my understanding of Serbian is q=1.0 if written in Latin alphabet. The official alphabet there is Cyrillic and it's reasonable to expect the pages will use it. I *want* it converted to Latin by my browser, even if I have fonts around. Why should I have those fonts? To write a word or two and put it in headings on some pages. You know, tho c00l stuff. :) > There may be servers that provide > transcriptions, and maybe that will be done automatically in the future. XPG4, I believe, describes such routines for the OS. -- Life is a sexually transmitted disease. dave@fly.cc.fer.hr dave@zemris.fer.hr
Received on Saturday, 7 December 1996 14:19:57 UTC