- From: Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 17:43:16 +0200
- To: Jonathan Rosenne <rosenne@NetVision.net.il>, www-international@w3.org
Jonathan Rosenne writes: > Martin Bryan wrote: > > When SC18/WG8 looked into sorting for ISO/IEC 10179 we came across a number > > of problems that prevented us from adopting a common algorithm ... > > > If SC22/WG20 can come up with an ordering that can be accepted by all > > dictionary producers as an internationally agreed standard I can assure you > > that SC18/WG8 will be only too glad to adopt it, but at present our > > community, the publishing world, cannot agree on a standardized ordering of > > accented characters > > I would like to add another problem preventing a useful international > standard on ordering: For a multilingual document which has Hebrew as > it's base language, the ordering of the index would have Hebrew > preceding other scripts. I suppose the parallel would apply to a > document which has Greek or Arabic as base language. The proposed > standard has the Latin script first, which may well be fine for a CEN or > ANSI standard, but I don't think it is apropriate for an ISO standard. Yes, the order of the scripts are a recognized problem, that we have addressed in 14651 and 14652 with a capability to reorder the scripts. For Hebrew, with the requirements stated, there is a need to have a Hebrew sorting specification with the Hebrew script first. This can be easily constructed from IS 14651. Keld
Received on Thursday, 24 October 1996 11:43:54 UTC