Thursday, 28 September 2006
Tuesday, 26 September 2006
Friday, 22 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
Thursday, 21 September 2006
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
Wednesday, 20 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Richard's editorial comments on ITS
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
Sunday, 17 September 2006
Friday, 15 September 2006
Thursday, 14 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
Wednesday, 13 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference
- I18n Comments
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
Tuesday, 12 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
Monday, 11 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Mary's editorial comments on ITS
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Richard's editorial comments on ITS
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] ITS markup must be integrated
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 dir
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 translate
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Spell out the attributes
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang missing
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 32 head
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] in the case of no selection
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] rubyText is an attribute
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use Japanese in Example 31
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 31 lacks rp
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default is ltr
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Refer to bidi article
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Some Hebrew quotation
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Is dir mandatory?
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Repetition
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] No implementation section
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Standardised wording
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Hard to know what this is about
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRef should allow for id strings
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRefPointer referant's data
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Pointing to terms
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Role of termInfo
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Marks terms and meanings
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Attribute used for locInfo
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 24
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Explanations for examples
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Examples 22 and 23
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Loc Info or Loc Note
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of elements
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Mention translation tools
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] 6.3 ed 1
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default translate value
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Inheritance of translation information
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Language information dc overview