[Comment on ITS WD] Example 31 lacks rp

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/

Comment 33
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
Editorial/substantive: E
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
6.6.2

Comment: 
I can't see any good reason why one should omit the <rp> markup in Example 31, but I can see very good reasons for including it. Please add.

Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 21:30:06 UTC