- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:32:33 +0000
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ Comment 33 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Editorial/substantive: E Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 6.6.2 Comment: I can't see any good reason why one should omit the <rp> markup in Example 31, but I can see very good reasons for including it. Please add.
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 21:30:06 UTC