- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:36:45 +0000
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ Comment 41 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Editorial/substantive: S Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 5.1, 5.3.2 Comment: We feel it is not acceptable that the markup proposed by ITS makes no mention of ways to define language for the content of ITS elements. At the very least, a proposed approach should be described in text, with xml:lang being held up as the most standard way to do things. Such text could say something like: "xml:lang should be available on the span element, unless the format into which ITS is being integrated has an attribute that fulfills the role of xml:lang, in which case that attribute should be available on the span element." And similar for other elements defined for ITS. ITS can point out that xml spec does define xml:lang in a global rules kind of way.
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 19:37:34 UTC