- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:16:21 +0000
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ Comment 2 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Editorial/substantive: S Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 6.7.1 Comment: We recommend that you say, BCP 47 instead of RFC 3066bis. We also strongly recommend that you add the phrase "or its successor" after reference to RFC 3066bis or BCP 47, since RFC3066bis is expected to become obsolete soon after it is released (to make way for RFC 3066ter).
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 19:16:29 UTC