- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:06:22 +0900
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org (I18N IG, for archiving only), member-i18n-core@w3.org
Hello Bjoern, Many thanks for your proposals. Unfortunately, at least I personally disagree with your text proposals, in particular with the idea to remove any mention of iso-8859-1. It is just the mention of iso-8859-1 that is crucial in this context, as it was most often misused. People put up a page in an arbitrary 8-bit encoding, labeled it as iso-8859-1, and constructed a font that made things look right. So using iso-8859-1 was explicitly part of the misuse, and trying to avoid mentioning it just obscures the issue. If you have any ideas of how to express things with mentioning iso-8859-1 (and again, not being overly complicated), that would be appreciated. Regards, Martin. At 22:18 05/02/08, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >* Martin Duerst wrote: >>It may "seem to imply" that iso-8859-1 is a coded character set, but >>it doesn't actually say so. If you have a proposal of how to change >>the text to avoid such an implication without making this more >>complicated for the average reader, I think the WG might be inclined >>to put it in. For example, what about > >I think any text that does not refer to something that can be confused >with a character encoding scheme would be better, for example, changing > > C076 [C] Content MUST NOT use a code point for any purpose > other than that defined by its coded character set. > > This prohibits the construction of fonts that misuse e.g. > iso-8859-1 to represent different scripts, characters, or > symbols than what is actually encoded in iso-8859-1. > >to > > ... > > This prohibits the construction of fonts that misuse e.g. > code points in the Basic Latin or Latin-1 Supplement range > (U+0000-U+007F and U+0080-U+00FF) to represent different > scripts, characters, or symbols than what is actually > representable using these code points. > >would satisfy me. It could also be changed to > > This prohibits the construction of content that misuses code > points in e.g. the Basic Latin Unicode range (U+0000-U+007F) > to represent different scripts, characters, or symbols than > what is actually representable using these code points by > depending on a specific incorrectly constructed font. > >or something else as long as the "ISO-8859-1" bit is removed. >-- >Bj$B‹S(Bn H$B‹I(Brmann $B%-(B mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de $B%-(B http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de >Weinh. Str. 22 $B%-(B Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 $B%-(B http://www.bjoernsworld.de >68309 Mannheim $B%-(B PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 $B%-(B http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 00:07:39 UTC