- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:39:29 +0100
- To: <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>
From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] Sent: 12 October 2004 15:54 To: Richard Ishida Subject: Re: Your comments on Character Model Fundamentals [LC067, LC069] Le 07 oct. 2004, à 05:18, Richard Ishida a écrit : > properties, or so. Then if that spec is updated, the generic reference > can be updated to the latest version of Unicode without problems, but I like your positivism ;) But it has been shown... that making generic references are indeed a problem for conformance. For example, FooML 1.0 makes references to BarML, because it's using it. BarML in the mean time goes from BarML 1.0 to BarML 2.0 and they change a few things. FooML 1.0 has a broken conformance because the modification of BarML 2.0 makes it impossible to implement it in FooML 1.0. But if you feel comfortable. Agreed. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2004 13:39:28 UTC