- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 11:53:02 +0900
- To: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>, <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>
At 17:54 04/05/25 +0100, Richard Ishida wrote: > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: M.T. Carrasco Benitez [mailto:cabe@dragoman.org] > >>Sent: 13 May 2004 11:29 > >>To: ishida@w3.org > >>Subject: Primary Language in HTML > >> > >>Richard, > >> > >>It might be of interest > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-html-lan.html > >> > >>Marking the language as an attribute of the element "html" > >>has at least the following disadvantages: > >> > >> - It is not possible the marking of bilingual documents, n-lingual > >>documents. Not in one single place, that is. But Addison said that it's better to consider this as meta-data, and then probably something like Doublin Core is better than Content-Language. > >> - The same information indicationg the language has to be repeated > >>as in your example <html lang="fr-CA" xml:lang="fr-CA" >. Well, yes, that's the problem of moving from html to x(ht)ml. > >> - Less probable to be process by the server for tranparent content > >>negotiation. I don't know of any server that looks inside documents to find <meta> and uses that for content negotiation, sorry. Regards, Martin. > >>Regards > >>Tomas > >> > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2004 00:24:17 UTC