- From: <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:21:23 +0000
- To: yazawa@globalsight.com
- Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, www-i18n-comments@w3.org
Hi Shigemichi,
On 13/03/2002 16:16:58 "Ishida, Richard" wrote:
[...]
> > - In the first Note in this section, it says "All specifications that
> > derive from the XML 1.0 specification [XML 1.0] automatically
> > inherit this Reference Processing Model." But XML 1.0 is not very
> > good example because it doesn't allow the use of the full range of
> > Unicode code points and it doesn't justify the exceptions.
>
> I think you're point here is that the XML spec doesn't *justify* why it
> excludes certain characters. Is that correct?
Please clarify whether you are referring to the characters allowed
in XML documents or to the characters allowed in XML names.
Thanks,
Misha
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 11:27:07 UTC