- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:40 +0900
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
- Cc: cmsmcq@acm.org (C. M. Sperberg-McQueen)
This is a last call comment from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (cmsmcq@acm.org) on the Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/). Semi-structured version of the comment: Submitted by: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (cmsmcq@acm.org) Submitted on behalf of (maybe empty): Comment type: substantive Chapter/section the comment applies to: 3.1.5 Units of collation The comment will be visible to: public Comment title: User control of collation, foreign matter Comment: Thank you for specifying that "[S] [I] Software that allows users to sort or search text SHOULD allow the user to select alternative rules for collation units and ordering." I am glad to see that you are not requiring that software use the collation rules of the user's language whether the user wants it to or not. The requirement "[S] [I] When sorting and searching in the context of a particular language, it MUST be possible to deal gracefully with strings being compared that contain Unicode characters not normally associated with that language" appears to be unenforceably vague: the word "gracefully" seems impossible to define sharply enough to allow objective determinations of whether a given spec or implementation conforms with this requirement or not. I would be loath to lose the word "gracefully" from the text, but I don't believe it belongs in a conformance requirement. Structured version of the comment: <lc-comment visibility="public" status="pending" decision="pending" impact="substantive"> <originator email="cmsmcq@acm.org" represents="-" >C. M. Sperberg-McQueen</originator> <charmod-section href='http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/#sec-CollationUnits' >3.1.5</charmod-section> <title>User control of collation, foreign matter</title> <description> <comment> <dated-link date="2002-07-12" >User control of collation, foreign matter</dated-link> <para>Thank you for specifying that "[S] [I] Software that allows users to sort or search text SHOULD allow the user to select alternative rules for collation units and ordering." I am glad to see that you are not requiring that software use the collation rules of the user's language whether the user wants it to or not. The requirement "[S] [I] When sorting and searching in the context of a particular language, it MUST be possible to deal gracefully with strings being compared that contain Unicode characters not normally associated with that language" appears to be unenforceably vague: the word "gracefully" seems impossible to define sharply enough to allow objective determinations of whether a given spec or implementation conforms with this requirement or not. I would be loath to lose the word "gracefully" from the text, but I don't believe it belongs in a conformance requirement.</para> </comment> </description> </lc-comment>
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 21:40:44 UTC