- From: Hidvégi Gábor <gabor@hidvegi.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:50:05 +0200
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Hey Patrick, thanks for the answer, what's the best way to contact browser vendors/responsible leaders? Gábor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> To: <www-html@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 11:07 AM Subject: Re: The ability to turn off animations in browsers > So, now that we've had a go at venting about "web designers" who use all > our CPU for animations and scripts, and advertisers for pushing wasteful > video our way (not just in the browser, but also in unrelated technologies > like Skype's native client) - and I'm surprised the old "dark websites use > less power on my CRT than bright websites" - the more fundamental > question: > > Why is this being discussed on www-html? Are we proposing some change to > HTML that will solve these issues? > > If we're saying "we'd like a setting in browsers that allows users to > suppress animations, scripts running in the background, video/audio > content autostarting, etc" then should this kind of request not be > directed at individual browser manufacturers? Or is there some new > element/meta/HTTP-header we're trying to come up with here? > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > ______________________________________________________________ > re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively > [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] > > www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk > http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ > ______________________________________________________________ > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > ______________________________________________________________ > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 04:50:31 UTC