- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:41:05 +0100
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- CC: W3C HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > On 11/06/2013 08:06, David Woolley wrote: > > It also has a disproportionate number of people who write about "web > designers" or "stylists" (in quotes, for effect) to show their disdain, > it seems ;) The reason I put "web designer" in quotes, was that the web is actually the hyperlinks that produce a rich network between multiple sites, whereas most people designing documents are not interested in designing to create such a web, and the network of links is a very low priority. A web designer is really a designer of media for consumption using the graphical rendering capabilities of "web" browsers, rather than their web capabilities. I don't think I have ever used "stylists" in quotes. I would note that I find a lot of people, at least amongst the over 45s, who really would prefer simple, static, "web site" design, and really do not like the trend to pop-ups, disguised links, etc. These are not people of whom I've been asking leading questions. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 07:41:31 UTC