- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:45:15 +0100
- To: "HTML WG" <www-html@w3.org>
- Cc: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "CSS 3 W3C Group" <www-style@w3.org>
My take on Scoped Stylesheets : http://blogs.developpeur.org/fremycompany/pages/scoped-stylesheet-vs-css-hierarchies.aspx @Boris: Can I please ask you to forward this mail to the HTML WG if it doesn't appear there later today? I'm still not subscribed to the HTML WG mailing list but I would like to give my opinion on that point. I'm in the process of entering the mailing list but it seems the process can be quite long and last several days. Thank you in advance! Best regards, François -----Message d'origine----- From: Boris Zbarsky Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 7:37 AM To: HTML WG Cc: www-style list Subject: and the cascade I've been looking into scoped stylesheets, and I'm not sure that the way the spec currently places them in the CSS cascade makes sense. If the intent is for them to be used for styling a particular subtree, it seems like they should probably come later than global document sheets in the cascade; otherwise you can end up with global sheets accidentally overriding scoped styles, which makes it difficult to really use scoped styles effectively. Of course the counterargument could be made that the opposite behavior would disallow document-global sheets from "fixing up" problems from scoped styles. Perhaps the cascading order should be: document normal rules scoped normal rules scoped !important rules document !important rules ? ccing www-style, but this discussion should probably happen on the htmlwg list, since that's where scoped styles are defined... -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 15:45:52 UTC