- From: ACJ <ego@acjs.net>
- Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 18:25:53 +0200
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-html <www-html@w3.org>
Sean B. Palmer schreef: > What I'm trying to understand is how BLOCKQUOTE came to be included, > partially in order to better understand why and how it should be used > now. A blockquote adds semantic value to the document. > For example, one could easily have eschewed BLOCKQUOTE in favour > of usual typographical conventions: > > <p>“First quoted paragraph.</p> > <p>“Second quoted paragraph.”</p> > Actually, it is a typographical convention to distinguish a block quote from the surrounding text by variation in typeface (italic versus roman, serif versus sans-serif), type size, or by indentation. This is easily realized with the use of an extra container element. > An argument against this now is that BLOCKQUOTE gives you independence > of styling. Independence of styling was, however, not an option in > late 1992 when CSS was yet to be invented. But then the default rendering already included special margins (that you mention later on). This is also a convention in typesetting, and impossible to pull off without the use of images, tables or css. Greetings, ACJ
Received on Saturday, 2 May 2009 16:26:38 UTC