W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > March 2009

Re: [OFF TOPIC] CRUD table form problems

From: Dustin Boyd <rpgfan3233@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:27:51 -0500
Message-ID: <ef7a0f3a0903261627h22bba1fexa41477a97ce57782@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-html@w3.org
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:21, Phillip Conrad <pconrad.cis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:47 AM, John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
> wrote:
>> Am I the only one on a "standards" mailing list that finds this statement
>> preposterous?  I hope that whomever Thufir finds to answer his question
>> provides a sufficiently useful answer - it might not be the *right* answer
>> of course, but it might suffice.
> I'm confident you aren't the only one.    Folks tend to wander onto this
> list rather frequently thinking that they will find help with basic HTML
> questions.
> They do not understand that this is a list for advanced practitioners that
> are helping to develop and refine new standards for HTML---and they may have
> been given incorrect advice to ask questions here.
> These folks are often not up-to-speed on even basic concepts such as what
> "validation" means in the context of producing language standards (e.g. the
> idea that a given string is either a sentential form in a given
> grammar---i.e. "valid"---or it is not.)

I think this might have something to do with the wording of the
current HTML 4.01 REC: "Public discussion on HTML features takes place
on www-html@w3.org (archives of www-html@w3.org)."

That might be misleading.  I doubt the spec would be updated just to
make a change for that since errors by people like Thufir don't happen
terribly often.  Here is my proposed addendum, disregarding what I
just wrote:
"Please note that it is not intended to be a source of help regarding
HTML.  There are a number of message boards with users who have more
time to address such issues."

It's just a thought, but it might help.

> This is unavoidable unless we make this a moderated list---which means some
> poor soul has to volunteer their time to read every posting and pass
> judgment on it.      Unlikely to happen.

I hope this doesn't happen, especially since that would require
changing the HTML 4.01 REC anyway.

Technology can be used for good or evil.  Remember that and determine
which side pays the most, taking into account the fact that payment
isn't always in the form of money.
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 23:28:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 30 April 2020 16:21:07 UTC