- From: Molte <molte93@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:42:32 +0100
- To: "Peter Krantz" <peter.krantz@gmail.com>
- Cc: "HTML Working Group Discussion Mailing-List" <www-html@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 5 January 2009 17:43:13 UTC
Are you saying that both might be W3C Recommendations? Should we not only have one standard to show web pages on the web? Isn't it the reason for a standard? 2009/1/5 Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 17:25, Molte <molte93@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > But as I said, I still believe it is stupid to develop them both when > only > > one of them is going to be used; > > I am not sure only one of them will be used. XHTML 2 is a generic > document language which may become a foundation for document-centric > apps that need an unambiguous way to include domain-specific data (via > RDFa). You may not see a lot of it on the open web, but it may well be > used a lot in specific technology domains. > > So, maybe there will be a place for both? > > Regards, > > Peter > -- Molte CosSinCalc http://cossincalc.com
Received on Monday, 5 January 2009 17:43:13 UTC