- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:38:53 +0100
- To: "David Dorward" <david@dorward.me.uk>, www-html@w3.org
- Cc: "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Hello David, Thanks for your comments. On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:45:30 +0100, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote: > I see the new version of http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/ has > been published. > > Unfortunately, due to being caught up with various minor crises, I > didn't find time to raise formal comments on some of the things in the > latest version before it got out of draft. > > So, informally then - could someone explain how the content of iframe > elements is considered different in HTML and XHTML documents? It must be > pretty significant since the content of the element is the only way to > provide alternative content for user agents which don't support or have > frames disabled. > > On the same note - how does having JavaScript turned off change the way > the content of the element is evaluated? These additions were suggested by Simon Pieters of Opera. His message that explains them is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Oct/0027 I hope this helps. Best wishes, Steven Pemberton For the XHTML WG
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 15:39:05 UTC