- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:16:19 +0100 (CET)
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- cc: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, www-html@w3.org
On 17 Nov, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> Section 3.6 would be much simpler if it didn't have to worry about
>> optional and implied tags.
>>
>> Section 3.8 would almost disappear.
>
> Why does the size of the spec matter? Surely the benefit to authors far,
> far outweigh the benefits to the spec community?
A monolithic specification is less likely to be read. A shorter, to
the point, specification benefit content and site creators alike.
--
- Tina Holmboe siteSifter Greytower Technologies
http://www.sitesifter.co.uk http://www.greytower.net
Website Quality and Accessibility Testing
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 23:16:56 UTC