- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:22:45 +0100
- To: Luca Passani <passani@eunet.no>
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, www-html@w3.org
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > So it seems to me you either need to: > > 1. Make the case that XHTML2 is not a natural migration target, or at > least that there are other natural migration targets which are likely to > include the "style" attribute or something very similar. > > /or/ > > 2. Make the case against removing the "style" attribute from any (X)HTML > standard. None of your arguments seem specific to XHTML 1.1 Basic anyway. I guess another line of argument would be: 3. That migrating from markup with the "style" attribute to markup without the "style" attribute will prove trivial. (You could look at how HTML Tidy pulls "style" attribute CSS into a "style" element, for example.) -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Monday, 30 June 2008 22:23:23 UTC