- From: Pete Johnston <Pete.Johnston@eduserv.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:39:28 -0000
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
In the CURIE Syntax WD of 20071126 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-curie-20071126/ Section 3 includes the line: > The concatenation of the prefix associated with a CURIE and its reference MUST be an IRI [IRI]. Maybe I'm misunderstanding this rule, but I wondered whether this was correct. It seems to me it is not the concatenation of prefix and reference which should form an IRI; rather, it's the concatenation of the IRI to which the prefix is mapped and the reference which should form an IRI. I think the summary of CURIE embedded in the RDFa Syntax draft http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdfa-syntax-20071018/#s_curies gets it right when it says > This IRI is obtained by taking the currently in-scope mapping that is associated with prefix, and concatenating it with the reference. The result MUST be a syntactically valid IRI Regards Pete --- Pete Johnston Technical Researcher, Eduserv Foundation Web: http://www.eduserv.org.uk/foundation/people/petejohnston/ Weblog: http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/ Email: pete.johnston@eduserv.org.uk Tel: +44 (0)1225 474323
Received on Friday, 11 January 2008 18:39:32 UTC