- From: Barry Rader <brader@boldinternet.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:44:16 -0500
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
I am not saying you should not give your first definition. There are however acronyms that are not always uppercase. So in a sense you could have a problem. Also when you have more then one Acronym with different meanings in the same article. This causes another problem. Using Jukka's Method I could have to scroll up some 500 lines to see the first instance. I am not saying these tags are for everyone. however they do have a purpose and I use them. Barry Rader David Dorward wrote: > > On 8 Jan 2008, at 17:07, Barry Rader wrote: >> For someone who cannot see how would they distinguish when your abbr >> and acronym is not just a word. >> >> Say for example MIA we have an MIA named Mia and we are discussing >> her. you define the first occurrence as suggested MIA (Missing in >> Action) all after that you are no longer required to define this. So >> when talking about Mia or MIA what is the distinguishing factor for >> the screen reader. > > The case of the second and final letters in the word (or abbreviation). > AFAIK, most screen readers already do this (as well as using internal > dictionaries to determine if it should be pronounced 'mia' or 'em eye > aye'). > >> I use <abbr> and <acronym> tags especially for longer pages I like >> being able to mouse-over or tab-over and see what an acronym means >> while I am reading. These are very helpful. > > Use Jukka's method and you can find out what it means without moving the > mouse or reaching for the tab key. >
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 17:44:47 UTC