- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:30:13 +0100
- To: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>
Livio Mondini wrote: > type of table: data_table and, if necessary and yes is necessary, > layout_table. Any long term solution to the problems that people are currently addressing with layout tables belongs in the style language, not HTML. That may mean that something other than the current CSS box model is needed, but it should be done within the style sheet, not the HTML. > In another life, maybe, clarify structure concept and definition. > example: <http://www.tiuvizeta.it/abstract_document.jpg> Please limit screen shots to the actual window (I think that is alt-PrtScn in Windows), and use an appropriate (i.e. lossless) compression scheme. (I'd estimate that this image takes 5 to 10 times as many bytes as it needs to. At least it wasn't attached.) > What is structure? titolo1 or h1? I'm not sure what the question is, but "structure" generally means identifying that "titolo1" is a heading and that it is a first level heading, so the answer is probably "h1". Note that XHTML 2.0 proposes the use of section elements that nest with the actual document hierarchy, so better reflect the overall document structure, and also a heading (h, I think) element that identifies an heading of the appropriate level for the depth of nesting. Separating content and presentation means using style sheets to indicate how h1 headers should appear, and, in particular, not simulating h1 headers by using <p><bold><font..... -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 22 September 2007 09:30:44 UTC