- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:17:27 +0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
Doug Schepers wrote: > I have no problem with requiring namespaces per se, but I don't see the > rationale in this instance. > Given that a namespace can be a single letter and a colon and that the main costs in using role are in getting commitment to the concept that it might be useful and thinking about sensible values for each attribute, or in choosing a high level authoring tool that does it all for you, my feeling is that including the namespace will act as a small extra deterrent to the tendency to embrace and extend, with negligible cost. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 08:17:44 UTC