- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 18:13:29 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
- cc: www-html@w3.org
lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au (Lachlan Hunt) wrote: >Here's a study of 500 pages done by Philip Taylor […] > >http://canvex.lazyilluminati.com/misc/copyright.html > >A quick review of the results shows that the majority of them are using >class="copyright" for actual copyright notices. It also shows that even given that miniscule and statistically insignificant sample there are a disproportionate number that do _not_ use the class 'copyright' for anything even remotely resembling a copyright notice. Thank you. It was gracious of you to cite a study that actually disproves your claim. We need more such fine examples of adhering to the scientific method. -- “Imagine a 40-pound ferret with a personality-defect who has been raised on a diet of anabolic steroids and weapons-grade PCP; and you have just said something unbelievably rude about his mother. Now you have to get him out of the trap…” -- Tanuki on Wolverines
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 16:14:03 UTC