- From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:23:21 -0700
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: >Jeff Cutsinger wrote: > > Show me an example of a popular WYSIWYG editor that does this. > >We're designing an HTML dialect for tomorrow, not for today. >Forget what current editors do : think about what tomorrow's >editors /could/ and /should/ do. I don't believe it is our (HTML WG) business to force authors to think differently about how they write content. Microsoft Word has stylesheets; it also has a bold button and font face/size controls. I use them both. If Word removed the bold button, et al, I would go find another editor. "Should" is a dangerous word. -C
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 20:23:39 UTC