W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2007

RE: Cleaning House

From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:23:21 -0700
To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5C276AFCCD083E4F94BD5C2DA883F05A27DA2598B5@tk5-exmlt-w600.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote:
>Jeff Cutsinger wrote:
> > Show me an example of a popular WYSIWYG editor that does this.
>We're designing an HTML dialect for tomorrow, not for today.
>Forget what current editors do : think about what tomorrow's
>editors /could/ and /should/ do.

I don't believe it is our (HTML WG) business to force authors to think differently about how they write content.

Microsoft Word has stylesheets; it also has a bold button and font face/size controls.  I use them both.  If Word removed the bold button, et al, I would go find another editor.

"Should" is a dangerous word.

Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 20:23:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 30 April 2020 16:21:02 UTC