- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 14:17:17 -0500
- To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- CC: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Chris Wilson wrote: > Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > >> Also, as was already hinted at in this thread, it's unlikely that >> mainstream browsers will actually implement the draconian parsing...and >> that's fine by me, I wouldn't insist on something like the >> "non-well-formed XHTML sent as application/xhtml+xml" error handling. >> > > Not sure what you mean. I would insist, if the XHTML were identified with an XML mime type, that it require XML well-formedness. If I had wanted to "support XHTML" by just piping "application/xml+xhtml" content through our tag-soup parser, I would have done that in IE7. :) > Yes, please!!! Absolutely have IE refuse to process the page if a document that claims to be XHTML (anything) is not well formed. Please Please Please. Stop the madness! -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 19:17:30 UTC