- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 15:23:57 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Quoting Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>: > We should also remain realistic. I've yet to see an editor that does > that and has been successful. Both on the web and outside it. If in the > future such an editor comes to exist we can always update the > specification. So how about, right here right now, moving the contentious <b>, <i>, <sub>, <sup> and <small> (did I miss any others?) under the "Presentational markup" section http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#presentational ? At least that starts marking them for what they are. P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 14:26:22 UTC