- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 13:00:41 -0500
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: tina@greytower.net, www-html@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > This seems to be the source of contention in the current debate. For > the spec to be implementable, it needs to define conformance > requirements for UAs, including error handling and how to handle both > existing and future content. Perhaps if those implementation conformance constraints were defined in a separate specification, it would help to clearly divide the issue? In the case of XHTML 2 the plan was always to have an implementors guide that went along with it to provide the sort of information I think you are talking about; but without confusing the authoring community with a lot of data that, frankly, is very domain specific. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 18:03:39 UTC