- From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA <leandro.dutra@corp.orolix.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:31:09 -0300
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 13:31:28 UTC
Em Sáb, 2007-03-24 às 17:46 +0000, Patrick H. Lauke escreveu: > Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA wrote: > > I use both the abbr and the acronym extensively. What is the reasoning > > for not retaining acronym in XHTML 2? > All acronyms are just a subset of abbreviations, so there's no need for > an extra element. Yes, but acronyms are pronounced as words, while all-uppercase non-acronym abbreviations are spelled out. So with different acronym and abbr elements a speech the user agent will know what to do, roughly — obviously hybrids (eg JPEG) will need special treatment. For example, NATO and HTTP. The first is an acronym, the second only an abbreviation. Am I getting anything wrong here? I found stuff such as http://www.designdetector.com/archives/04/12/AcronymsAndAbbreviations.php, but now clear reasoning for simply removing acronym. I would love to have pointers, even if it is just a thread in this or any other fora. -- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA <leandro.dutra@corp.orolix.com> http://orolix.com.br./ +55 (11) 2122 0302 Join the FSF: http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=4686
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 13:31:28 UTC