- From: Barry <barry@polisource.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:12:15 -0500
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, www-html@w3.org
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > ...based on my > assumption, it would be ok to include both <title> and <meta > property="title"> in the same document. Logically, it may not make much > sense to do so, but that doesn't automatically make it non-conforming. Maybe the specs should say that markup that's not explicitly non-conforming but is contradictory with other markup or otherwise illogical, such as [title example], should be considered non-conforming. That would lessen my concern over there possibly being too many ways to be non-conforming for it to be worth the effort to define and specify agent behavior for each case. My wording would hopefully cover more than one case. Another widely scoped spec that would apply could be a default precedence. In the event of a precedence issue that's not explicitly resolved in the specs, such as [title example], the markup appearing later will have precedence.
Received on Saturday, 10 March 2007 02:12:33 UTC