- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:53:52 +0100
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > It is questionable whether embed needs to have > fallback content [...] <embed> /absolutely/ needs fallback content. It is a kludge, proposed only because (a) some browsers support it, and (b) Microsoft have hijacked <object>. To hear someone as knowledgeable as Lachlan argue that it might not need fallback content is intensely depressing, harking as it does to the pre-accessibility, pre-enlightenment, dark ages ... Philip Taylor
Received on Sunday, 1 July 2007 08:55:16 UTC